Monday, June 9, 2014   VOLUME 10 ISSUE 23  
FREE SUBSCRIPTION!
Back to the Newsletter
News Sponsored by Afton Chemical
 News Sponsored by Afton Chemical
News Sponsored by Neste Base Oils
 News Sponsored by Neste Base Oils
News Sponsored by Argus
 News Sponsored by Argus
News Sponsored by Inter Lubric China
 News Sponsored by Inter Lubric China
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 6
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 5
Subscribe, Unsubscribe or Change Your Options
Click Here to Subscribe, Unsubscribe or Change Your Options
Valvoline Australia Under Fire for TV Ad

Australia's Advertising Standards Bureau has condemned Valvoline Australia's latest TV advertisement for its new marketing campaign, "Man Like Horsepower". The advertisement is for Valvoline SynPower Engine Oil and features Neanderthal looking men driving motor vehicles and doing burnouts in Camaros, BMW M3s and Mercedes C63 AMG Coupes, but then transforming into humans when they step out of the car.

The Advertising Standards Board (ASB), responding to complaints which stated that such driving is unacceptable and encourages reckless driving, deemed the TV ad "breaches Section 2 of the Advertiser Code of Ethics" but Valvoline is contesting the finding, requesting an independent review.

A sample of comments which the complainant/s made regarding this advertisement included the following:
"Hoon driving is a serious community problem and this ad promotes hook driving. This is very irresponsible and not acceptable considering the road trauma which results from hook driving. I'm aware car companies can't use high speed driving to promote vehicles and this should be considered the same. The driving seen is unacceptable and encourages reckless driving. I noticed this advertisement a lot over the Easter break and feel it is unacceptable given the risk of the driving shown on tv, encouraging hoons to be like real men."

Comments which Valvoline made in response to the complainant/s regarding this advertisement include the following:
"We refer to your letter dated 20 April 2014 regarding the complaints received concerning the advertisement relating to section 2.6 of the AANA Code of Ethics. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the issues raised in the complaints. The drivers of the vehicles are clearly depicted as primal men/Neanderthals in a fantasy scenario. This is evidenced by their extreme all over body hair & Neanderthal-like expressions. They are not intended, nor are they portrayed, to be human characters in a realistic setting. It is also clear from the end of the advertisement that a human did not drive the car, when upon exiting the vehicle, the primal man/Neanderthal transforms into a clean-cut human male. We deny that the advertisement encourages reckless driving or dangerous behaviour in breach of general community standards on health and safety. Nowhere in the advertisement are these drivers glorified or applauded; rather this driving is clearly in the context of a fantasy situation and the portrayal of the drivers as wild creatures clearly implies their behaviour is not sophisticated or desirable and definitely not to be copied. In any event, we confirm that none of the stunt style driving takes place on any public road or in any public area and were performed by professional stunt drivers. Where the driving takes place in public roads there is no “stunt” driving taking place, only standard driving within the traffic regulations. On the basis of the above, while we welcome and support the right of individuals to raise concerns about advertising through the ASB, we respectfully submit that the complaints should be dismissed on the basis that the advertisement is clearly fantasy and the driving depicted occurs in the context of that fantasy."

The Advertising Standards Board considered whether this advertisement breaches Section 2 of the Advertiser Code of Ethics. The Board noted the complainant’s concerns that the advertisement glorifies reckless driving which is against prevailing community standards and encourages hoon like driving behaviour. The Board viewed the advertisement and noted the advertiser’s response. The Board considered Section 2.6 of the Code. Section 2.6 of the Code states: “Advertising or Marketing Communications shall not depict material contrary to Prevailing Community Standards on health and safety”. The Board noted that the advertisement depicts characters driving various vehicles repeatedly doing ‘burnouts’ including in front of a group. The advertisement ends with the text “advanced engineering for a primal need, man like horsepower.” The final scene shows the Valvoline logo. The Board noted that the advertisement is intended to make the main characters appear primal or Neanderthal in nature. The Board noted that the distinction between the characters not being ‘real’ or being non-human is not clear. The Board noted that the end shot of the advertisement does show the Neanderthal man getting out of the car and he is clean cut and well groomed, however it is not apparent that the character is no longer going to drive in a manner that is primal or reckless.

The Board noted that the advertisement was a television advertisement with a PG rating, designed to reach the target market of young males aged 18-24 who would relate to the scenarios presented in the advertisement. The Board considered that the message that was being delivered was not clearly about choosing the right oil for your car and was more strongly suggestive of the types of ways a car could be driven. The Board considered that the advertisement depicts scenes that young adults would relate to and that the approach did undermine the importance of driving carefully and within the law. The Board considered that the advertisement does encourage the unsafe practice of burnouts or drifting and that this is material contrary to Prevailing Community Standards regarding responsible driving. The Board determined that the advertisement did breach Section 2.6 of the Code. Finding that the advertisement did not breach the Code on other grounds, the Board upheld the complaint.

Valvoline said it is disappointed with the Board's decision and will be seeking an independent review. In the meantime, out of respect for the Board's determination, Valvoline said the advertisement will be modified.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
News Sponsored by Lubrizol
 News Sponsored by Lubrizol
Reference Center

Global Lube Base Oil Specifications

API Group I
API Group II
API Group III
API Group IV
API Group V

Archive
June 2, 2014
May 26, 2014
May 19, 2014

[MORE]

Please send all comments and correspondence to lubritec@aol.com.

Published by Lubrication Technologies, Inc.
Copyright © 2014 Lubrication Technologies, Inc.. All rights reserved.
FORWARD TO A COLLEAGUE
Privacy Policy
Powered by IMN