News Sponsored by Chevron Base Oils

Monday, May 11, 2015   VOLUME 11 ISSUE 19  
FREE SUBSCRIPTION!
Information on Advertising
Back to the Newsletter
News Sponsored by Afton Chemical
 News Sponsored by Afton Chemical
News Sponsored by HollyFrontier
 News Sponsored by HollyFrontier
Media Partner ACI Europe
 Media Partner ACI Europe
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 6
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 5
Subscribe, Unsubscribe or Change Your Options
Click Here to Subscribe, Unsubscribe or Change Your Options
California Bill AB 628 Seeks to Include Biosynthetic Base Oils as "Used Oil"

NORA, An Association of Responsible Recyclers (formerly the National Oil Recyclers Association) issued comments on A.B. 628, an Assembly Bill encouraging the procurement of “biosynthetic” lubricants, after it was submitted in California earlier this year.

NORA does not oppose the promotion of non-petroleum based lubricants, often referred to as “bio-lubes.” The primary problem presented by A.B. 628 is the oil recycling industry’s inability to collect, process and recycle used lubricants consisting of a combination of petroleum and biodegradable lubricants. The chemistry of these two categories of lubricants is too dissimilar to permit recycling of any mixture of these materials. Moreover, no technology is commercially available that can efficiently separate the animal and plant fat phase of the mixture from the petroleum phase.

The numerous specific technical problems with attempting to recycle used bio-lube materials include:

• The distillation of the bio-lube oil results in a solid bottoms residue (in contrast to a pumpable, viscous material from normal used oil re-refining that can be marketed as an asphalt additive).

• The distillation of the bio-lube oil creates a residue material that polymerizes in and plugs overhead condensers.

Moreover, the yield of re-refined bio-lube feedstock material is 10 to 15 percent below that achieved from normal (petroleum-based) used oil.

In addition to the technology and chemistry obstacles that impede recycling of used bio-lube materials, another problem is that the logistical structure for collecting and transporting bio-lube materials does not exist. To implement the objective of A.B. 628, a parallel system of storing, collecting, transporting and re-refining bio-lube materials would have to be constructed. In addition, in view of the fact that very few bio-lube re-refining facilities currently operate or are planned for construction, the overall transportation costs to convey bio-lube materials from the many points of generation to a re-refining facility would be prohibitively expensive.

This bill is similar to California SB 916 that NORA and its members worked to defeat last year.

NORA represents over 390 leading companies involved in the responsible recycling of used oil and related materials that would otherwise negatively impact the environment. NORA members work every day to ensure that more than a billion gallons per year of used oil and related materials are collected, recycled and given another useful life. NORA has been defending and promoting the industry since 1985.


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
News Sponsored by Savant Labs
 News Sponsored by Savant Labs
Reference Center

Global Lube Base Oil Specifications

API Group I
API Group II
API Group III
API Group IV
API Group V

Archive
May 4, 2015
April 27, 2015
April 20, 2015

[MORE]

Please send all comments and correspondence to lubritec@aol.com.

Published by Lubrication Technologies, Inc.
Copyright © 2015 Lubrication Technologies, Inc.. All rights reserved.
FORWARD TO A COLLEAGUE
Privacy Policy
Powered by IMN