News Sponsored by Oronite

Monday, June 5, 2017VOLUME 13 ISSUE 23
FREE SUBSCRIPTION!
Information on Advertising
Back to the Newsletter
News Sponsored by HollyFrontier
News Sponsored by HollyFrontier
News Sponsored by Martin Specialty Products
News Sponsored by Martin Specialty Products
News Sponsored by Vertex-Penthol
News Sponsored by Vertex-Penthol
Media Partner
Media Partner
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 6
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 5
Subscribe
Click Here to Subscribe, Unsubscribe or Change Your Options
BP Lubricants, CarSense Hit with Lawsuit over Warranty Tie-Ins

A class action lawsuit has been filed in Pennsylvania against BP Lubricants USA and used car dealer CarSense, alleging that the defendants sell a written warranty that violates the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act because the warranty contains an illegal tying provision.

Citing alleged abuses of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA)—which prohibits tie-in sales provisions that effectively lock consumers in with warranty issuers by forcing them to buy an item or service to continue coverage—the complaint alleges the defendants sell cars with warranties that require purchasers to use only premium Castrol motor oils.

When accessorizing your vehicle with aftermarket parts, your warranty claim cannot be automatically denied, nor can your warranty be voided, if you install non-OEM parts in your vehicle. The burden is on the dealer to prove the aftermarket parts caused the failure.

The plaintiffs claim this is the exact conduct the MMWA was enacted to fight. While they believed they were paying for peace of mind when they initially bought their car and warranty, the plaintiffs claim the defendants instead forced them into a one-sided contract over which they would ultimately end up paying more for repairs than they had bargained.

“Under the MMWA, [the defendants] have created an illegal tying arrangement by requiring [the plaintiffs] to change the motor oil in their vehicle every 4,000 miles of four months with only Castrol products,” the lawsuit alleges. “[The plaintiffs] are paying more for Castrol products than what they would pay for substantially similar or possibly superior motor oils.”


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
News Sponsored by Zschimmer & Schwarz
News Sponsored by Zschimmer & Schwarz
Reference Center

Global Lube Base Oil Specifications

API Group I
API Group II
API Group III
API Group IV
API Group V

Archive
May 29, 2017
May 22, 2017
May 15, 2017
May 8, 2017
May 1, 2017

MORE

Please do not reply to this message. Replies to this message are routed to an unmonitored mailbox. Please send all comments and correspondence to lubritec@aol.com.
Published by Lubrication Technologies, Inc.
Copyright © 2017 Lubrication Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.
FORWARD TO A COLLEAGUE
Privacy Policy

Powered by IMN™