News Sponsored by Chevron Base Oils

Monday, March 14, 2016   VOLUME 12 ISSUE 11  
FREE SUBSCRIPTION!
Information on Advertising
Back to the Newsletter
News Sponsored by Afton Chemical
 News Sponsored by Afton Chemical
Media Partner ICIS
 Media Partner ICIS
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 6
Digital Book: LubriTec Synthetic Lube XRef - ED 5
Subscribe, Unsubscribe or Change Your Options
Click Here to Subscribe, Unsubscribe or Change Your Options
Brightstock Alternatives Will Gain Ground as the Market Anticipates a Deficit of over 6.0 KBD

The brightstocks market faces dwindling Group I supplies. In its recently published report, The Global Business Outlook for Brightstocks, global market research and management consulting firm Kline estimates that, even with limited new capacity additions, the market will experience a potential deficit of at least 6.0 KBD by 2025.

Although there will be loss in demand for brightstocks from automotive engine oils due to the shift towards multigrade oils, that alone cannot compensate for the declining supply. Blending requirements for marine and other heavy industrial lubricants continue to expand demand for brightstocks, a critical component for these applications. Spotting an opportunity, a few brightstock suppliers have undertaken capacity expansion projects that will address some of the growing deficit.

Rationalization of older, less efficient Group I basestock plants has resulted in a decline in brightstock supplies, and this trend is expected to continue in the future. Although other production routes are available and brightstocks can be produced by Group II and naphthenic refineries, few refiners have taken that route. For instance, SK Lubricants produces brightstock at its Group II basestocks plant. Ergon (Vicksburg) and PetroChina (Karamay) produce Group I and Group II quality brightstocks from naphthenic crude sources, respectively.

According to Anuj Kumar, Project Manager in Kline’s Energy Practice, “The anticipated shortfall in the brightstocks market is expected to be bridged by various substitute products, including polyisobutenes (PIBs), polyalphaolefins (PAOs), and polyalkyleneglycols (PAGs). Of all the potential substitutes, PIBs are expected to address the bulk of the brightstock shortfall after taking into account the blending cost, technical performance, compatibility issues, and consumer behavior. However, pricing and availability are the two prime factors that could hinder the acceptability of PIBs (and other substitutes like PAO and PAGs) in the event of a shortage for brightstocks.”

To make the analysis more comprehensive, this study has included not only just conventionally produced API Group I brightstocks, but also brightstocks produced in non-conventional ways, such as those produced with Group II and naphthenic basestocks. These unconventional brightstocks account for roughly 10% of this overall market.

Aiding industry professionals in their business planning, Kline’s The Global Business Outlook for Brightstocks report provides answers to the following questions:

· What are the blending options available in the emerging market scenario?

· For which applications do brightstocks remain a critical blending component?

· Which applications will be relatively easier to switch to substitute products?

· What are the various substitutes available in the market to replace brightstocks?

· What is the technical and commercial suitability of these substitutes in various applications?


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
Reference Center

Global Lube Base Oil Specifications

API Group I
API Group II
API Group III
API Group IV
API Group V

Archive
March 7, 2016
February 29, 2016
February 22, 2016
February 15, 2016
February 8, 2016

[MORE]

Please send all comments and correspondence to lubritec@aol.com.

Published by Lubrication Technologies, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Lubrication Technologies, Inc.. All rights reserved.
FORWARD TO A COLLEAGUE
Privacy Policy
Powered by IMN